Therapeutic management of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis patients - an analysis from the Swiss EUSTAR cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune connective tissue disease leading to microvascular and fibrotic manifestations in multiple organs. Several treatment options and recommendations from different European countries are available. In this study, for which the ambit is Switzerland specifically, we aim to describe the treatment patterns of systemic sclerosis patients with fibrotic manifestations. METHODS: Systemic sclerosis patients were selected from six Swiss tertiary centres recorded in the multicentre, prospective European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) registry. Patients fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR systemic sclerosis classification criteria at baseline were included. To determine the differences in treatment of varying degrees of fibrosis, four groups were identified: (1) patients with a modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) >0; (2) those with mRSS ≥7; (3) those with interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), diagnosed by either chest X-Ray or high-resolution computed tomography; and (4) patients fulfilling one of the additional criteria for extensive interstitial lung disease, defined as interstitial lung disease involvement of >20% in high-resolution computed tomography, dyspnea NYHA-stage 3/4, or a predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) of <70%. RESULTS: A total of 590 patients with systemic sclerosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In this cohort, 421 (71.4%) had mRSS >0, of whom 195 (33.1%) had mRSS ≥7; interstitial lung disease was diagnosed in 198 of 456 (43.4%), of whom 106 (18.0 %) showed extensive interstitial lung disease. Regarding non-biologic disease-modifying medications (DMARDs), the most frequently prescribed was methotrexate, followed by hydroxychloroquine and mycophenolate mofetil. Rituximab and tocilizumab were most frequently used among the biologic DMARDs. Specifically, 148/372 (39.8%) of treated patients with skin fibrosis received methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab, and 80/177 (45.2%) with interstitial lung disease received cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, tocilizumab or rituximab. Most patients received a proton-pump inhibitor, and few patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. CONCLUSION: Overall, in Switzerland, a wide range of medications is prescribed for systemic sclerosis patients. This includes modern, targeted treatments for which randomised controlled clinical trial have been recently reported.

Potential of Photon-Counting Detector CT for Radiation Dose Reduction for the Assessment of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the potential of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) for radiation dose reduction compared with conventional energy-integrated detector CT (EID-CT) in the assessment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, SSc patients receiving a follow-up noncontrast chest examination on a PCD-CT were included between May 2021 and December 2021. Baseline scans were generated on a dual-source EID-CT by selecting the tube current-time product for each of the 2 x-ray tubes to obtain a 100% (D 100 ), a 66% (D 66 ), and a 33% dose image (D 33 ) from the same data set. Slice thickness and kernel were adjusted between the 2 scans. Image noise was assessed by placing a fixed region of interest in the subcutaneous fat. Two independent readers rated subjective image quality (5-point Likert scale), presence, extent, diagnostic confidence, and accuracy of SSc-ILD. D 100 interpreted by a radiologist with 22 years of experience served as reference standard. Interobserver agreement was calculated with Cohen κ, and mean variables were compared by a paired t test. RESULTS: Eighty patients (mean 56 ± 14; 64 women) were included. Although CTDI vol of PCD-CT was comparable to D 33 (0.72 vs 0.76 mGy, P = 0.091), mean image noise of PCD-CT was comparable to D 100 (131 ± 15 vs 113 ± 12, P > 0.05). Overall subjective image quality of PCD-CT was comparable to D 100 (4.72 vs 4.71; P = 0.874). Diagnostic accuracy was higher in PCD-CT compared with D 33 /D 66 (97.6% and 92.5%/96.3%, respectively) and comparable to D 100 (98.1%). CONCLUSIONS: With PCD-CT, a radiation dose reduction of 66% compared with EID-CT is feasible, without penalty in image quality and diagnostic performance for the evaluation of ILD.